This is a boon to photographers who want consistency and reliability. The user interface in Lightroom Classic has received many tweaks and changes over the years, but it’s still remarkably similar to early versions. The company kept the traditional Lightroom but renamed it “Lightroom Classic” and named the new program “Lightroom CC.” More recently, Adobe dropped the “CC” from the newer program’s name, making it just “Lightroom.” While its suite of editing options was not nearly as comprehensive as traditional Photoshop, it quickly became the de facto solution for photographers who wanted one program to manage and tweak all their digital images.Įverything changed again ten years later when Adobe rewrote Lightroom from the ground up to meet the changing needs of modern photographers. They needed a digital asset management solution.Īdobe solved this problem in 2007 with the release of Photoshop Lightroom, an all-in-one program that handled every element of a true end-to-end digital photography workflow: importing, organizing, editing, and exporting. However, as digital photography increased in popularity and image libraries ballooned to tens and hundreds of thousands of files, it was clear that photographers needed more than just an editing solution. The process was often slow and painstaking, but over time those types of programs improved – and now they’re indispensable tools of the trade. In the early days of digital photography, nascent editing applications like Adobe Photoshop and Corel PaintShop Pro let photographers edit, alter, and otherwise manipulate their images. ![]() ![]() ![]() Even their application icons are nearly identical! But which one is right for you? Lightroom vs Lightroom Classic: Both programs are excellent, and they’re similar in many ways.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |